Hospital fined Rs 7 lakh for not taking consent before inserting catheter in a patient

Saturday, May 13, 2017

New Delhi: The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has held Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research guilty of negligence for not taking consent before inserting a catheter for central venous line procedure in a patient and directed the Delhi-based hospital to pay a compensation of Rs 7 lakh to him.

In its order dated May 5, a bench of Justice Ajit Bharihoke and Anup K Thakur said doctors must take consent of a patient or his family members for any invasive procedure during treatment. The provision of taking consent could be overlooked only if urgent intervention was required to save the life of a patient, the bench added.

Advocate Nikhil Jain, appearing for the patient, contended that the doctors had not taken consent of the family members and alleged that due to their negligence, the patient’s jugular artery was ruptured resulting in profuse bleeding and he had to be shifted to another hospital for treatment, reports ToI.

Read the full judgement

Categories: Medico-Legal, NEWS

Tags: , , , , ,

  More from Medico-Legal

Hospital fined Rs 7 lakh for not taking consent before inserting catheter in a patient

Hospitals can’t hold patients hostage for unpaid bills: High Court

Supreme Court slaps Rs 1.4 crore fine on two doctors for providing medical shelter to murder accused

Doctor ordered to pay Rs 41 lakh as compensation for medical negligence leading to patient’s death

No courtroom exposure to medical students as MCI doesn’t prescribe it: AIIMS

Chennai hospital ordered to pay Rs 3 lakh for wrongly diagnosing TEN as measles


Comment by Prashant
2017-10-19 16:01:53

There is no such thing as jugular artery…..So how did they rupture it??……
Atleast article should be reviewed be publishing.

Comment by Rajeev
2017-11-20 22:58:35

Exactly so…dr.prashant, u these ppl r never competent to even properly state a medicolegal issue. Obviously they publish biased stories against Medical fraternity… to satisfy political interests & also to satisfy hateful commoners & hooligans. Either they do so willfully, avoiding d whole story….or they do so ignorantly, by uttering gibberish/stupid terms & prove that they r always incompetent to judge a medico. Only an expert medico can judge an apparently accused medico.
They r not even providing ppl the latest ammendment stated by d honorable supreme court regarding​ d application of d term “negligence” against docs & lawyers.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> in your comment.