94% of white coats used in hospitals contaminated by dangerous bacteria and fungus: Study

Sunday, January 22, 2017

Hyderabad: A study, published in the International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, says that 94% of white coats worn by doctors and other staff in hospitals are contaminated by dangerous bacteria and fungus like Aspergillus, which lead to nosocomial (hospital-acquired) infections.

What’s even more worrying is that the bacteria and fungus present in these white coats have developed resistance to several antibiotics. Even pens and stethoscopes used by doctors can harbour disease-causing microorganisms.

Despite this, there are instances when white coats are not washed for more than two weeks, the study reveals. Only a minuscule percentage of health professionals wash it daily, according to researchers R Saraswati Jayanthi and F Noor of Malla Reddy Medical College for Women.

As part of the research, the team analysed about 200 samples collected from various departments, including medical, surgery, obstetrics & gynaecology, dermatology, paediatrics, ophthalmology and dentistry. About 70 doctors were included in the study, reports ToI.

Categories: Preventive Medicine, RESEARCH

Tags: , , , ,

  More from Preventive Medicine

94% of white coats used in hospitals contaminated by dangerous bacteria and fungus: Study

Adequate nutrition alone could prevent over a million adults from developing TB every year in India: Study

Worse than toilets: hospital elevator buttons a hidden source of bacteria

Physicians’ stethoscopes more contaminated than palms of their hands

Study shows community approach effective in fight against diabetes

Sudden blood pressure drop with position change linked to higher risk of heart failure

Comments »

No comments yet.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.