Safety concerns linger for generic oncology drugs in developing countries

Thursday, November 3, 2016

Washington: Although generic oncology drugs can reduce patient costs and improve treatment access, the safety of these drugs in developing countries is uncertain, according to an international research team led by Dr Charles Bennett, Josie M Fletcher professor and chairman of the S C SmartState Centre in Medication Safety and Efficacy at the College of Pharmacy at the University of South Carolina.

For the study — published in Lancet Oncology as part of a three-part series examining oncology drug safety — the researchers reviewed clinical, policy, safety and regulatory data from around the world, including unpublished data from the food and drug administrations of Japan and the United States. After analysing safety data, they found that generic cancer drugs are generally safe in countries with rigorous regulatory programmes similar to the FDA in the United States. However, in countries with less rigorous regulation, such as India, Iraq and Colombia, safety is far from certain, they wrote.

Noting manufacturing problems with generic drug facilities in India, the researchers found that US FDA inspections of generic drug manufacturers in India have nearly doubled from 59 in 2009 to 111 in 2015. About 40 percent of all generic drugs used in the United States are manufactured in India, where the researchers reported three classes of medications are created: branded drugs produced and promoted by reputable Indian or multinational companies; branded generics produced but not promoted by the manufacturer; and unbranded generics produced in facilities that do not meet developed countries’ regulatory standards and are distributed only in India, highlighting the gap between patient access to high quality generic drugs in developed versus developing nations.

In addition, the researchers found that although generic oncology drugs in the United States offer equivalent safety to brand-name drugs, they do not offer patients the price savings seen in other developed countries. According to the researchers, economic studies show US generics do not result in price competition unless four or more generic options have received FDA approval.

However, they said time and cost barriers may prevent such competition from emerging, noting the average FDA generic drug review costs $6 million and takes 18 months. Given the high cost of cancer treatment, Bennett and colleagues argue the agency should shorten the application review period and slash application costs to improve the US cancer cost curve.

“Developed countries have an opportunity to improve health disparities in developing nations by helping to build reliable supply chains and robust regulatory systems,” Bennett said. “Here in the United States where branded and generic drugs are safe, we must also work to lower treatment access barriers for patients by eliminating regulatory hurdles that discourage competition in the generic manufacturing sector.”

Categories: Medicine, Oncology, RESEARCH

Tags: , ,

  More from Medicine

Safety concerns linger for generic oncology drugs in developing countries


Pharmaceutical industry-sponsored meals associated with higher prescribing rates


Researchers combine drugs to develop a new treatment for human parainfluenza virus


Common painkillers are more dangerous than we think


Stronger evidence found for link between prenatal exposure to paracetamol and the risk of developing asthma


US scientists document trajectory of Zika virus for first time

Comments »

No comments yet.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.