NEWS

Rejected by UPSC twice, physically challenged doctor battles for justice

Friday, November 8, 2013

by Vidhi Rathee

New Delhi: “Lightning does strike twice and at the same place when it comes to the plight of persons with disabilities,” said Dr Satendra Singh, a polio survivor and assistant professor of physiology at the University College of Medical Sciences (UCMS) and Guru Teg Bahadur (GTB) Hospital, New Delhi.

Dr Satendra Singh

In 2011, Dr Singh applied for the post of assistant professor (physiology) in the Teaching Specialist sub-cadre of the Central Health Service through the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). His application was rejected on the grounds that a person with disability is not applicable for this job. After seeking intervention by the health ministry, he was allowed to appear for the interview.

Recently, another recruitment call for the same post was advertised by the UPSC, vide Advertisement No. 16/2013, in which it invited applications for 10 posts of assistant professor in physiology. Buoyed by the previous court judgments and ministerial orders in his favour, Dr Singh applied again and was initially relaxed when the online registration process asked for his disability, type and percentage.

However, within seconds, his hope came down crashing when the website during registration flashed, “Sorry you are not suitable for this post.” As the last date for submitting applications for the post is November 15, Dr Singh is again in a fix.

“The UPSC is blatantly refusing to safeguard the legitimate rights of disabled. The Supreme Court has recently given a landmark judgment on fulfilment of posts for disabled applicants. How many lives have been adversely impacted and how many disabled people have lost on jobs due to discriminatory attitude of the UPSC,” slammed Dr Singh.

Dr Singh told India Medical Times, “This is not only a discrimination. Despite repeated orders, the UPSC did not consider disability certificate from a government hospital. They are adamant on their own Proforma V. Moreover, they also want picture of the disabled candidate showing their full disability. Isn’t this discrimination of highest order? You even do not rely on experts and want to humiliate a disabled by posing for you.”

He further said, “Even in the last court case, the UPSC was adamant that these posts are not identified as being suitable for people with disabilities. I would like to draw their attention to the list of posts identified by MSJE (ministry of social justice and empowerment) vide Notifications No. 16-70/2004-DDIII dated January 18, 2007; March 15, 2007 and March 22, 2007 which clearly identifies the post on Page 51, Item number 752 (Asstt Prof, Science, University and College Teachers) for persons with disabilities in Group A.”

“Moreover, all disabled medical students attend clinical postings, operation theatres, OPDs and emergency postings during internship. It’s only after the successful completion of these that they are awarded MBBS, MD/MS degree, who is UPSC then to question us?” asked Dr Singh.

In 2011, when his application was rejected by the UPSC, it was no less than a shock for Dr Singh, as he was already in a permanent government job, on the same post in a prestigious medical college (UCMS). Dr Singh then brought the matter to the notice of the National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People (NCPEDP), who then brought the matter to the urgent attention of the union health ministry. Since the interviews were a couple of days ahead, he had to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) as well for help.

Dr Singh said, “Back then in 2011, the tribunal scolded UPSC and I was allowed to appear on the last day of the interview. Few days later, Additional Secretary – Health, Keshav Desiraju, also intervened and conveyed his concern over recurring of such cases time and again.”

A fax was sent by the health ministry to the UPSC stating, “It has been decided that Dr Singh and other similarly placed candidates, if any, may be called for the interview. A detailed clarification in this regard will follow shortly.”

Now that the history is repeating itself, Dr Singh is nothing but disappointed over the repeated discrimination that doctors with disabilities are experiencing again. Such applicants cannot apply for these posts in physiology, psychiatry and urology.

This year, Dr Singh also received the NCPEDP-MphasiS Universal Design Award on his disability initiatives. Since 2011, he has filed several RTIs (Right to Information applications) and exposed inaccessible hospitals, ATMs, colleges and post offices.

Perhaps, it’s time that the UPSC brings more transparency and streamlines the arduous process of selection of persons with disabilities.

by Vidhi Rathee

Categories: NEWS

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  More from NEWS

MCI to update its panel of medical college assessors


Govt doctor barred from practising for 3 months for attending workshop sponsored by private company


63 million people in India living with diabetes


Govt committed to ensuring quality healthcare to all: J P Nadda


Gynaecologist suspended, SMO shifted following deaths of five newborns in Ludhiana


Johns Hopkins names eight scholars to improve healthcare in India

4 Comments »

Comment by Saroja, D.
2013-11-09 06:53:19

It may be hard to believe for many that UPSC has appointed many faculties in medical colleges while they were carrying fictitious post graduate degrees . The degrees were not duly recognised by MCI at the time of appointment and even 10 years later when a present director of a cancer institute raised questions about this appointment the MCI gave recognition to that degree in retrospect, even for the period when those departments were not conforming to basic minimal requirements as laid down by MCI. M.D> Radiotherapy degree of Maulana Azad Medical College was not recognised till above sited intervention and the M.D> RAdiotherapy degrees of any of the Rajasthan Universities was not recognised till the director raised this issue.

One wonders as to why MCI remembers to recognise the degrees in such a rush? Why the recognition was granted even for the period that was not fulfilling the bare minimal requirements. AT least in this case we see the disasters brought by these unrecognised degree holders in MAMC where because of their performance , inefficiency, negligence the fictitiously recognised MD course has been derecognised again after 25 years or so of its existence and all the three unrecognised degree holders yet got promoted to Director Professor’s posts with all their dubious and useless academic records not worthy of their becoming teaching faculty. Any investigator to take action on this?

 
Comment by Dr Satendra Singh
2013-11-10 10:20:55

It’s not about the Assistant Professor post of Physiology alone in Advt 16/2013. You cannot apply for Psychiatry, Urology also. As it was not enough, I saw the new advt 17/2013 yesterday on UPSC site and and tried creating registration for the posts of Senior lecturer in Pathology, Radiodiagnosis, Anaesthesiology and Professor in Physiology at GMC Chandigarh through UPSC but the moment you enter disability details they reject your application. The problem is more for general candidate applicants (like me) since it’s mandatory to answer whether you are disabled or not and the moment you mention the truth, they kick you out. Perhaps our policy makers should learn about Dr Advani and Dr Verghese (wheelchair doctors from India)

 
Comment by drrm
2013-11-11 17:53:49

keep battling dude…pay for getting into this moron medical system…

 
Comment by Maj Pankaj Rai (Retd)
2013-11-11 17:55:55

Very sad to hear with what is going on with Dr Singh. I think that the only way out for Dr Singh is to file contempt proceedings against UPSC in Delhi High Court. A person who is physically challenged is perhaps likely to be more compassionate. The discrimination practised by UPSC is deplorable.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.